Thursday, May 30, 2019
net bans :: essays research papers
     In July of 1995, Florida put into effect a new law banning the use of gill nets in each(prenominal) inshore water of Florida. The law contained two significant provisions 1) some non-gill nets would be allowed, but maximum size would now be limited to ergocalciferol square feet and 2) unemployment compensation would be available to affected netters through a 20 million dollar fund set aside to purchase the nets that would be made obsolete(Stearns, par.5). This ban on nets has led to a dramatic comeback for a variety of fish species, including the Spanish mackerel and Florida mullet. In the following essay I intend to show the ban laws, what they encompass whom they affected, as well as their reaction. Most importantly, I intend to show the ban has made an overall rise on Floridas marine environment.     Over the past 100 years, Florida has been known for having some of the best recreational fishing as well as marine environments. Local s and tourists as well could pick any given day to spend on the water and return with a wide variety of game fish. Unfortunately, over the past ex this trend has been on the decline. The cause of this decrease in the population of Floridas marine environment as well as in other parts of the world, is the undiscriminating use of the monofilament fishing net (par.2). One of the areas that have seen just how destructive these nets can be, is the Florida Coast.     In 1990, commercial-grade gill-netters proceedsed 26 million pounds of mullet (DeYoung, par.56). In 1994, Floridas became affright when the mullet spawning population ploped to about 15 percent of normal. They also felt the impact this loss of forage food had on game fish. One of the largest causes of this plummet is the lucrative market in the Far East for mullet row, which had almost completely decimated Floridas stock of these fish (Stearns, par.2-3).      Due to this large de cline, the Florida Marine Fisheries Commission (MFC) fixed restrictions on recreational and commercial harvest of mullet. In 1992, recreational fishermen were now limited to fifty fish per boat per day, with no size limit, while commercial fishermen have no "bag limit", but are required to release any mullet under eleven inches in length. The results of the restrictions lowered the harvest on mullet by recreational fishermen from four million to one million pounds. There was a 75 percent reduction in recreational harvest as a result of the FMCs restrictions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.